· Supreme Power is an extraordinary book that rings with relevance for our time. One of the most eloquent historians of his generation, Jeff Shesol has a deep understanding of the presidency, and the interplay of politics, personalities, and principles, all of which he brings to life in this rich, remarkable book. 1 Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States Written Testimony of Jeff Shesol Author, Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court August 27, . · In Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court, Jeff Shesol manages to do something rare: combine excellent research and a gripping narrative.(For those familiar with Rick Perlstein's Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus, I think the writing style and amount of detail are similar).The book deals with Franklin D. Roosevelt's attempt to Cited by:
Author Jeff Shesol posed these questions at a CAP event last Wednesday about his new book Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. The Supreme Court. Shesol was joined by Dahlia Lithwick, senior. www.doorway.ru: Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court: Shesol, Jeff, Foster, Mel: Books. Jeff Shesol is a historian, communications strategist, speechwriter, and lapsed cartoonist. The Supreme Court. Supreme Power. Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court. Mutual Contempt. Lyndon Johnson, Robert Kennedy, and the Feud that Defined a Decade.
Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court By Jeff Shesol Hardcover, pages W.W. Norton Co. List price: $ Read An Excerpt. Shesol also draws attention to a more mundane but nevertheless considerable factor in the shift of the court. In Roosevelt supported, and Congress approved, a bill to assure retired justices. The book deals with Franklin D. Roosevelt's attempt to pack the Supreme Court with extra justices in - an attempt that ultimately failed and, unfortunately, few people remember today. Shesol brings this important episode in our history to life. First of all, Shesol resists the temptation of many historians to make the past prologue.
0コメント